"The evidence CONTRARY to the above picture actually shows that coal does not take millions of years to form, as is commonly asserted.
Dr. Russell Humphreys reveals what scientists are learning about helium diffusion in earth’s deep core samples. Gathered as part of the RATE (Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth) project, this ground-breaking analysis sheds new light on the true age of our planet.
If you enjoy learning about the universe and the many secrets within the vast heavens, you'll deeply appreciate this up-to-date and highly informative DVD.
(Part 1 of 2) This 1 hr program presents geo-physical evidence that seems to firmly suggest that the Earth is not 4 billion years old.
Creationist Kent Hovind Reveals The Truth About The Garden of Eden and Creation!
In fact, the formation of coal has been proven, did you hear me.....PROVEN to be a rapid process that can be duplicated in modern laboratories in a matter of days - or even hours."
The Evidence presented on this page IS IRREFUTABLE in its scientific scope, peer-reviewed and PROVEN beyond a reasonable doubt from my perspective and the perspective of the Scientists who found the evidence!
Look, you and I BOTH know that you as an Atheist are dead set against REAL EVIDENCE coming forth so let's not kid ourselves here:
A.) You won't answer these questions with true science or even honestly ever!
B.) You will use the old "insult and demean" trick rather than argue the facts presented!
"Evolutionary theory" requires millions of years in the formation of coal in order to afford time for the development of living organisms whose fossils are found in coal deposits, fossils that they say were trapped in the deposits when they died.
However, laboratory and field research has demonstrated that coal is formed rapidly and in vast quantities in every instance.
These vast coal deposits have no pollution by other material, they are pure coal so there is no reason to think the deposits are tampered with at all.
The conclusion is then naturally drawn from this that if the deposits are young then the earth around it must be young as well.
The actual research does indicate a young age to the Earth that contains such coalified materials.
In order for coal to be formed, several factors must be present.
I. Rapid Formation
coal to form.1
By treating coal with epoxy and slicing it into thin sheets, Dr. Gentry was able to examine tiny, compressed radiohalos found in the coal. Radiohalos are discolorations in the coal, ejected by radioactive elements in the centers (such as uranium).
Later, uranium solutions infiltrated the water-saturated logs, and uranium decay products were collected at tiny sites within the logs.
However, because coal is not a malleable substance, scientists know that these logs had not turned to coal at the time the compression event occurred. This points to a quick burial and coalification of the logs – rather than a long time period.2
II. Decay Ratios
III. Polystrate Fossils
According to evolutionary theory the different sedimentary layers took hundreds of thousands of years to accumulate.
However, we know this is impossible since the tree would have decomposed long before the sediments would have had time to accumulate.
Rather, this tree is testimony to the catastrophic and rapid burial that must have taken place.
IV. Unsullied Deposits
This leaves scientists with the baffling question of how the seams get so massive and still remain undiluted by influxes of clay and other impurities before they thicken."4
O.K. so we've learned that a young Earth is more than probable its likely as PROVED by Coal deposits and the untrue statements of Evolutionary science.
Watch (Click the Link) the complete video below to find out some amazing facts concerning the problems of Evolutionary Theories of men vs. The Creative acts of God!
The deluded, ignorant followers of Darwin believe that man is actually a type of animal. I disprove this godless blasphemy with totally real facts.
Creation vs Evolution Origin of Life (7 articles) When, why, and how did life begin?
Was it a meaning-less accident, or do we live within a God-created universe?
"Speak to the earth, and she shall teach thee."
What exactly does the earth tell us about its history?
What does the Bible say about earth's history? Does carbon dating prove the Earth is millions of years old?
Now lets look at the TRUE facts concerning Micro and Macro evolution and just what the real science states!
Micro and Macro-Evolution Explained
Macro-evolution is a theory that has never been observed in science.
The point of contention is not on what is observed, but the belief systems that interpret what is being observed. Nothing in the Bible contradicts science; it is the assumptions that evolutionists insert into their world view that contradict the Bible.
Evolution is a hypothesis introduced as a possible explanation of origins, let us not loose sight of this FACT.
In this article, my goal is to explain the difference between micro and macro-evolution and show why micro-evolution cannot result in macro-evolution.
Micro-evolution is a fact.
Micro-evolution is the alteration of a specific trait due to natural response.
Take a look at Darwin’s observation of the changes in finches.
His assumption was that evolution was changing this species.
However, these finches remained finches.
We clearly observe natural selection, but not macro-evolution.
There are three plainly observable principles to micro-evolution.
This theory was thought up as a hypothesis and as science advances, the facts have not been found to support it, but much has been provided to dispute it.
There are three critical flaws in the theory of evolution through gradual change:
1. Dysfunctional change or otherwise noted as irreducibly complex.
This need for completeness can be clearly observed from the most primitive single celled animal to the most complex mammal.
2. The DNA code barrier.
Mixing the available genetic code will produce variations in the trait but will not change into a completely different feature.
The Origin of Species--Creationism and Evolution
There are several flaws with this theory.
Change can be rapid when leaving the ‘norm’, but slows and eventually stops as the ‘ceiling’ is reached.
The only way evolution (i.e. Macro evolution) could be possible is if new information were to be added to the DNA.
Introduction to Scientific Creationism
For evolution to be possible, there must be new information added that did not previously exist.
Survival of the fittest is what thins out the gene pool; it does not increase or add to the genetic data.
If Darwin had been correct in his observation and the Galapagos Island finches permanently weeded out the shorter beaked finches, they have not added to the gene pool, but they have subtracted genetic code and would no longer have the information necessary to produce offspring that has a shorter beak.
Natural selection and evolution work against each other.
Natural selection does sometimes make changes within a species, but the progression is downward and not upward – and the species does not become a new species, but rather a variation of the old.
We don't observe this happening.
Richard Dawkins is arguably the most influential proponent of evolution today.
In a debate, he was asked to provide one example where new information was added to DNA as observed by science.
After a long silence, he passed by the question.
He later rebutted the question with a three page argument but never addressed this original question and he did not provide one example.
This is exactly what I was saying on my other page that skeptics do: Avoid the original question because your proof is non-existent and answer with another issue unrelated to the original problem!
Even environmental adaptations harm the evolution belief system.
In reality, they are weak germs.
Interdependency also renders evolution an impossibility.
If a plant is dependent on an animal and an animal is dependent on that specific plant, the two would have to emerge from the evolutionary change at the exact same time and place.
One generation later is too late.
This cannot be overcome.
Don’t mistake micro-evolution for Darwinian evolution.
They are not related.
When the facts stare evolutionists in the face, they are reduced to either insulting those who present the evidence or they must admit their world view doesn’t hold water.
Evolutionists always call Christians and creationists non-thinkers because we question the illogical theories they believe, but that's just what a true THINKER does...questions theory so it can be brought into the realm of fact.
Anyone who gets angry at the facts is not defending science, but is defending their hope that God does not exist and their hope that there is no God in which we are accountable.
Exchanged Life Outreach